The Circuitry
THE CIRCUITRYYour one-stop source for all tech news
HOMETODAYNEWSFEEDEVENTS
BOOKMARKS
RSS
© 2026 The Circuitry
About UsSourcesContactCorrectionsPrivacy
  • Today
  • Feed
  • Events
  • Saved
Scroll for more
Verification
VERIFIEDConfidence: HIGH
Source identified
Claims cross-referenced
No discrepancies found
Sourcing
1source

via The Verge

The Verge · track record
89Stories
100%Verified
2030d
All sources →
Home/Tech/CNN Sues Perplexity Over Verbatim AI Article Copies
VERIFIEDBy Xavier Rivera· ·1.5 min read

CNN Sues Perplexity Over Verbatim AI Article Copies

CNN has sued Perplexity in New York, alleging the AI company's tools produce verbatim reproductions of its reporting while bypassing subscription barriers. The action forms part of a growing wave of copyright cases filed against the startup by major news and reference organizations.

Source:The Verge
Post
CNN Sues Perplexity Over Verbatim AI Article Copies
TL;DRAI · 60 sec read

CNN sues Perplexity in New York court for generating verbatim copies of its articles via AI. The complaint says the tool bypasses paywalls and ignores crawler blocks after licensing talks collapsed. CNN seeks damages and an injunction. Perplexity joins other publishers already suing the startup over unauthorized content use.

CNN filed a lawsuit against Perplexity in a New York court on Thursday, accusing the startup of using its AI tools to create verbatim copies of the network's reporting. The complaint also claims that Perplexity delivers paywalled material to its users.

The company, which runs an AI answer engine and the Comet browser, reportedly failed to honor CNN's attempts to identify or stop its crawlers from scraping material. According to the filing, "Human beings report, research, write, edit, and create the content that Perplexity takes without permission or compensation."
Human beings report, research, write, edit, and create the content that Perplexity takes without permission or compensation.

One example cited in the suit alleges that feeding Perplexity's search feature with the headline of a specific story produced substantial verbatim excerpts from it. The article in question is titled "What’s next for Minneapolis? A shaky promise, mounting tensions and the fight for control."

The move places CNN among several other organizations targeting Perplexity with copyright claims, such as The New York Times, Encyclopedia Britannica, Merriam-Webster, and News Corp., the owner of The Wall Street Journal. Amazon and Reddit have also filed separate suits against the startup.
From The CircuitryThe Feed — live briefs across tech, all day.See what’s happening →

Negotiations for a licensing pact that would have let Perplexity's Comet Plus subscribers access CNN material beginning in October 2025 reportedly collapsed over disagreements on usage restrictions and other terms. CNN terminated those talks in November, then sent a letter ordering Perplexity to cease unauthorized exploitation of its articles and trademarks. The AI firm allegedly offered no reply.

The network is pursuing monetary damages together with a permanent injunction against the challenged practices. A Perplexity spokesperson, Jesse Dwyer, stated that "You can’t copyright facts."
Perplexity has drawn criticism from multiple legacy media outlets that view its summarization methods as a threat to original journalism.
Why this mattersAI · ~100 words

Tap a lens to see what this story means for you.

Reader-supported
DonateBuy me a coffee →Follow@thecircuitry_ →Follow@thecircuitry.to →

Reader-supported · The Brief

Liked this? The Brief brings you the whole day in tech, verified, every morning. Two minutes, free forever.

HELP US IMPROVE
From The Circuitry

See what’s happening right now

The Feed runs all day — short, verified briefs the moment they break.

Open the Feed →
From The Circuitry

Follow @thecircuitry_

Every story we publish, as it happens. No noise between.

Follow on X ↗On Bluesky ↗

Reader-supported

The Circuitry is a passion project I've always wanted to build, and I love the work behind it.

Running it costs real money. APIs, hosting, time. To keep improving the site and growing this into something useful for everyone, those costs have to be covered.

Any contribution is appreciated. If not, no pressure. Thanks for reading.

Buy me a coffee
AICopyrightLawsuit
More fromThe Verge
  • EU slaps Alphabet with €890 million fine over Google Search favoritism and Play Store restrictions

    Tech · 1d
  • AMD to invest up to $5B in Anthropic

    Tech · 2d
  • Judge pauses Paramount-Warner Bros Discovery merger

    Tech · 4d
More inTech
  • Critical CVE-2026-56163 Hits Azure Kubernetes Service

    Tech · 4h
  • Google Adds Selfie Video for Account Recovery

    Tech · 1d
  • EU slaps Alphabet with €890 million fine over Google Search favoritism and Play Store restrictions

    Tech · 1d
SupportThe Work

The Circuitry is reader-supported. If you find the daily brief useful, you can buy me a coffee to keep it going.

Buy a coffee →
SubscribeCircuitry Brief

Liked this? The Brief brings you the whole day in tech, verified, every morning. Free forever.

MORE IN TECH

Critical CVE-2026-56163 Hits Azure Kubernetes Service

Microsoft disclosed CVE-2026-56163, a critical vulnerability in Azure Kubernetes Service with a CVSS 3.1 score of 10.0 that allows unauthorized network-based privilege elevation. The flaw was received from Microsoft on July 24, 2026 and requires immediate attention from Azure Kubernetes users to prevent high-impact compromise.

Google Adds Selfie Video for Account Recovery

Google has rolled out a selfie video option that lets users recover their Google Accounts by recording head movements for comparison against a stored video. The encrypted feature adds another recovery method while recommending multiple sign-in options and includes safeguards against AI-based impersonation.

EU slaps Alphabet with €890 million fine over Google Search favoritism and Play Store restrictions

The European Commission has fined Alphabet €890 million for two DMA violations: self-preferencing its own services in Google Search and restricting payment steering options in the Play Store. Google must revise its policies within 60 days or face further penalties.