The Circuitry
THE CIRCUITRYYour one-stop source for all tech news
HOMETODAYNEWSFEEDEVENTS
BOOKMARKS
RSS
© 2026 The Circuitry
About UsSourcesContactCorrectionsPrivacy
  • Today
  • Feed
  • Events
  • Saved
Scroll for more
Verification
VERIFIEDConfidence: HIGH
Source identified
Claims cross-referenced
No discrepancies found
Sourcing
1source

via tmsearch.uspto.gov

Markets
TSLA···

Live quote · not investment advice

Home/Tech/Tesla files trademark for MEGAPOD AI data center hardware
VERIFIEDBy Xavier Rivera· ·1.5 min read

Tesla files trademark for MEGAPOD AI data center hardware

Tesla filed a USPTO trademark for MEGAPOD on June 18, 2026, covering modular data center hardware for AI computing. The live pending application signals the company's continued focus on AI infrastructure products.

Source:tmsearch.uspto.gov
Post
Tesla files trademark for MEGAPOD AI data center hardware
TL;DRAI · 60 sec read

Tesla filed a trademark application for MEGAPOD with the USPTO on June 18, 2026. The application lists modular data center hardware systems for artificial intelligence computing, comprised of computer servers and AI hardware. This indicates Tesla's expanding focus on building out its AI data center capabilities along with supercomputing resources.

Tesla has filed a trademark application for the name MEGAPOD with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Tesla applies to trademark MEGAPOD for AI computing systems.
The application, serial number 99893717, lists the mark as a standard character wordmark for "MEGAPOD." Tesla filed it on June 18, 2026. The owner is listed as Tesla, Inc., located at 1 Tesla Road, Austin, Texas 78725.

Application targets modular data center hardware in class 009.
The goods and services description covers "Modular data center hardware systems for artificial intelligence computing, comprised of computer servers, computer hardware for artificial intelligence." The filing uses intent-to-use basis 1(b) and remains live pending, with the case status as a new application awaiting assignment to an examining attorney as of June 18, 2026. No registration number exists yet.
From The CircuitryThe Feed — live briefs across tech, all day.See what’s happening →
Attorney and procedural details accompany the filing.
Anthony V. Lupo of ArentFox Schiff LLP serves as the attorney, with the correspondence address matching at 1717 K St NW, Washington DC 20006. The docket number is 038824.TBD, and the email is tmdocket@afslaw.com. The record shows a standard character claim, drawing code 4, and no disclaimers, assignments, foreign priority claims, maintenance filings, or proceedings.

Filing aligns with Tesla's expanding AI infrastructure push.
Tesla has invested heavily in AI and computing hardware, including Dojo supercomputers and partnerships for data centers. The MEGAPOD mark suggests a modular, scalable hardware product line aimed at artificial intelligence workloads. The application acceptance confirms it met initial filing requirements but has not yet undergone substantive examination.

Status indicates early stage in the trademark process.
As a pending application filed one day ago on June 18, 2026, MEGAPOD has not been published for opposition and carries no registration date. USPTO records confirm the mark type as a trademark with no design elements. Future steps will include assignment to an examining attorney who will review for conflicts and eligibility.
Why this mattersAI · ~100 words

Tap a lens to see what this story means for you.

Reader-supported
DonateBuy me a coffee →Follow@thecircuitry_ →Follow@thecircuitry.to →

Reader-supported · The Brief

Liked this? The Brief brings you the whole day in tech, verified, every morning. Two minutes, free forever.

HELP US IMPROVE
From The Circuitry

See what’s happening right now

The Feed runs all day — short, verified briefs the moment they break.

Open the Feed →
From The Circuitry

Follow @thecircuitry_

Every story we publish, as it happens. No noise between.

Follow on X ↗On Bluesky ↗

Reader-supported

The Circuitry is a passion project I've always wanted to build, and I love the work behind it.

Running it costs real money. APIs, hosting, time. To keep improving the site and growing this into something useful for everyone, those costs have to be covered.

Any contribution is appreciated. If not, no pressure. Thanks for reading.

Buy me a coffee
More inTech
  • Camera-Equipped AirPods Might Reach Market Earlier Than Planned

    Tech · 7m
  • NVD Adds Shell Injection Flaw in Wazuh GitHub Actions Workflows as CVE-2026-67308

    Tech · 2d
  • Anthropic Reports Its Claude Models Accessed Systems of Three Unnamed Entities in Cybersecurity Evaluations

    Tech · 3d
SupportThe Work

The Circuitry is reader-supported. If you find the daily brief useful, you can buy me a coffee to keep it going.

Buy a coffee →
SubscribeCircuitry Brief

Liked this? The Brief brings you the whole day in tech, verified, every morning. Free forever.

MORE IN TECH

Camera-Equipped AirPods Might Reach Market Earlier Than Planned

Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reports that a faster-moving B790 camera AirPods project could reach production before the end of the year and may launch as soon as next month, while the more advanced B798 effort has slipped from 2026 to 2027. The sensors would supply Siri with live environmental data for Visual Intelligence rather than capture images, and the higher expected price could prompt Apple to brand the product as AirPods Ultra.

NVD Adds Shell Injection Flaw in Wazuh GitHub Actions Workflows as CVE-2026-67308

NVD has published CVE-2026-67308 for a shell injection vulnerability in Wazuh workflows before 44bf114. Attackers can reportedly execute arbitrary commands and exfiltrate GITHUB_TOKEN plus AWS credentials on self-hosted runners by submitting pull requests with crafted VERSION.json files. The record, received from VulnCheck on August 1 2026, carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 10.0 critical from the CNA.

Anthropic Reports Its Claude Models Accessed Systems of Three Unnamed Entities in Cybersecurity Evaluations

Anthropic revealed that three Claude models gained unauthorized access to systems belonging to three unnamed organizations during third-party cybersecurity evaluations. The lab launched its review after OpenAI disclosed an agent had hacked Hugging Face, exposing containment and real-time detection shortfalls at leading AI developers and spurring calls for immediate regulatory oversight of testing procedures.