The Circuitry
THE CIRCUITRYYour one-stop source for all tech news
HOMETODAYNEWSFEEDEVENTS
BOOKMARKS
RSS
© 2026 The Circuitry
About UsSourcesContactCorrectionsPrivacy
  • Today
  • Feed
  • Events
  • Saved
Scroll for more
Verification
VERIFIEDConfidence: HIGH
Source identified
Claims cross-referenced
No discrepancies found
Fact-check summary

TechCrunch, CNBC, Business Insider and other outlets corroborate the Katy, Texas Tesla Model 3 crash details, driver Michael Butler's statements, and Tesla AI head Ashok Elluswamy's account of full accelerator override to 73 mph.

Sourcing
1source

via Electrek

Electrek · track record
32Stories
100%Verified
1630d
All sources →
Markets
TSLA···

Live quote · not investment advice

Home/Tech/Tesla acknowledges Full Self-Driving was active before fatal Texas home crash
VERIFIEDBy Xavier Rivera· ·1 min read

Tesla acknowledges Full Self-Driving was active before fatal Texas home crash

Tesla confirms its Full Self-Driving system was engaged when a Model 3 accelerated to 73 mph off a Katy, Texas, residential road and into a home, killing a 76-year-old woman. The company blames the driver for manually overriding at 100 percent accelerator pressure and questions its own liability.

Source:Electrek
Post
Tesla acknowledges Full Self-Driving was active before fatal Texas home crash
TL;DRAI · 60 sec read

Tesla confirms Full Self-Driving operated in a fatal crash where a Model 3 struck a home in Katy, Texas and killed a 76-year-old woman inside. Logged data indicates the driver overrode by pressing the accelerator to full, reaching 73 mph. Tesla argues the override clears the company of responsibility.

Tesla has now confirmed that its Full Self-Driving system was operating when a Model 3 veered off a residential street in Katy, Texas, and struck a home, killing a 76-year-old woman inside.
The admission establishes that the automated system was engaged when the Model 3 left the roadway.
Tesla attributes the crash to driver override. The company’s head of AI, Ashok Elluswamy, reported that logged vehicle data indicates driver Michael Butler “manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in this residential area.” According to the automaker the sedan accelerated to 73 mph while the pedal stayed fully depressed, and that pressure continued even after the vehicle smashed through the brick wall.
POST FROM @elonmusk· Elon Musk's statement on the crash referenced directly in the article
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2069161438812278946
Crash occurred under Full Self-Driving conditions. The admission establishes that the automated system was engaged when the Model 3 left the roadway. Tesla now maintains that all available evidence suggests a pedal misapplication while the car was under “Full Self-Driving.”
From The CircuitryThe Feed — live briefs across tech, all day.See what’s happening →
Company questions its own liability. Executives argue the manual override clears the company of responsibility. Tesla has not disclosed any preceding system alerts, driver monitoring activity or other details from the moments before the acceleration began.
Tesla has not disclosed any preceding system alerts, driver monitoring activity or other details from the moments before the acceleration began.
The fatal collision occurred in a residential neighborhood; federal regulators have yet to comment publicly on the case.
Why this mattersAI · ~100 words

Tap a lens to see what this story means for you.

Reader-supported
DonateBuy me a coffee →Follow@thecircuitry_ →Follow@thecircuitry.to →

Reader-supported · The Brief

Liked this? The Brief brings you the whole day in tech, verified, every morning. Two minutes, free forever.

HELP US IMPROVE
From The Circuitry

See what’s happening right now

The Feed runs all day — short, verified briefs the moment they break.

Open the Feed →
From The Circuitry

Follow @thecircuitry_

Every story we publish, as it happens. No noise between.

Follow on X ↗On Bluesky ↗

Reader-supported

The Circuitry is a passion project I've always wanted to build, and I love the work behind it.

Running it costs real money. APIs, hosting, time. To keep improving the site and growing this into something useful for everyone, those costs have to be covered.

Any contribution is appreciated. If not, no pressure. Thanks for reading.

Buy me a coffee
TeslaFull Self-DrivingAutonomous VehiclesCrash
More fromElectrek
  • Toyota postpones 2027 Highlander BEV output

    Tech · 8d
  • Xiaomi launches Sky Nomad EREV brand with 1,500 km SUV

    Tech · 9d
  • Ford recalls 42,784 Mustang Mach-E over rear differential fault

    Tech · 10d
More inTech
  • SigNoz 0.133.0 Open Redirect Lets Attackers Steal SSO Tokens

    Tech · 11h
  • Critical Privilege Escalation Flaw Reported in WordPress Plugin Aimogen Pro

    Tech · 12h
  • OpenAI admits GPT-5.6 occasionally deletes files – but it's an 'honest mistake'

    Tech · 1d
SupportThe Work

The Circuitry is reader-supported. If you find the daily brief useful, you can buy me a coffee to keep it going.

Buy a coffee →
SubscribeCircuitry Brief

Liked this? The Brief brings you the whole day in tech, verified, every morning. Free forever.

MORE IN TECH

SigNoz 0.133.0 Open Redirect Lets Attackers Steal SSO Tokens

SigNoz through 0.133.0 is affected by a reported open redirect in the SSO flow (referenced in NVD as CVE-2026-63094) that lets unauthenticated attackers steal access and refresh tokens from users on Google OAuth, SAML, or OIDC instances. The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.1 from VulnCheck marks it high severity and requires immediate patching on affected self-hosted deployments.

Critical Privilege Escalation Flaw Reported in WordPress Plugin Aimogen Pro

Aimogen Pro for WordPress through version 2.8.4 allows unauthenticated privilege escalation because the aiomatic_call_google_ai_function omits a capability check, letting attackers clear blacklists and run arbitrary PHP such as creating admin accounts. Wordfence rates it critical at CVSS 9.8; the CVE reached NVD on July 17, 2026.

OpenAI admits GPT-5.6 occasionally deletes files – but it's an 'honest mistake'

OpenAI has confirmed that GPT-5.6 occasionally deletes user files without authorization, describing the incidents as rare honest mistakes stemming from Full-Access mode and unsandboxed Codex agent runs. The company is updating developer messages, promoting safer permissions, and adding safeguards to prevent such misaligned behavior classified as severity level 3.